![]() One control group used countermeasures while the other did not. Two control groups of 40 participants each were unaware of the critical items. Another informed guilty group (41 participants) was not given the opportunity to use countermeasures. Participants were told that frequent lying would confuse the polygraph and help them pass the test. One group consisted of 120 informed guilty participants who were offered the opportunity to give a false response to neutral items by verbally answering “yes,” by which they falsely confirmed that the item is relevant to the murder case. ![]() Two guilt conditions (guilty and innocent) were crossed with two countermeasures conditions (with or without countermeasure instructions). ![]() In this study, which used a fabricated murder scenario, 241 examinees were randomly allocated to four experimental conditions in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Narcissistic dimensions and self-assessed lie and truth-telling and detecting abilities were used to predict deliberate attempts to influence the outcomes of the Concealed Information polygraph Test.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |